Nice little CMB2 benchmark comparison from @wahalahti j.ustin.co/2cow2Qn
10:30am Sep 22nd 2016 view on twitter
Comments are closed.
@jtsternberg @wahalahti I’ve seen much worse performance numbers for ACF, so I do this if I have to use it: https://t.co/GVEfFRgiYC
@BillErickson My test was quite basic; clean wp, only ACF and QM installed, nine fields. @Jtsternberg
@BillErickson Performance gets worse the more fields there is. I think even basic sites have at least 20 fields nowdays. @Jtsternberg
@wahalahti @BillErickson @Jtsternberg Luckily we have this thing called “cache” to battle any load time issues. But it could be faster.
@k1sul1 If you have cache and know how to use it ;) I dare to claim that even all agencies and developers dosn’t @BillErickson @Jtsternberg
@jtsternberg @wahalahti I’ve seen much worse performance numbers for ACF, so I do this if I have to use it: https://t.co/GVEfFRgiYC
@BillErickson My test was quite basic; clean wp, only ACF and QM installed, nine fields. @Jtsternberg
@BillErickson Performance gets worse the more fields there is. I think even basic sites have at least 20 fields nowdays. @Jtsternberg
@wahalahti @BillErickson @Jtsternberg Luckily we have this thing called “cache” to battle any load time issues. But it could be faster.
@k1sul1 If you have cache and know how to use it ;) I dare to claim that even all agencies and developers dosn’t @BillErickson @Jtsternberg