Justin Sternberg @Jtsternberg
Southport, NC, USA | http://about.me/jtsternberg

May 2013

@markoheijnen @GetSource & the duty to check for existing methods in this->image would fall on dev.

9:50am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@markoheijnen @GetSource This does make sense to me.. Would be nice if a method was provided to get the->image

9:50am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@markoheijnen @GetSource That would be great. Seems there are several unnecessarily protected methods/parameters in WP_Image_Editor.

9:49am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@chrisjean You should put that up on github. :)

9:46am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@chrisjean Interesting. I’ll throw this in the plugin i’m working on. Am I the only one who finds it odd this isn’t in core?

9:46am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@GetSource @markoheijnen Seems odd that I need to create an extended class just to allow access: j.ustin.co/17DFlbp

9:24am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@GetSource @markoheijnen Curious the decision behind making the $this->image parameter in WP_Image_Editor_Imagick protected.

9:21am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@chrisjean Was curious so I could judge how old it was. :) Found it when looking for a WP function to do this: j.ustin.co/17DDzad

9:17am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

@chrisjean is this codebase on github perchance? j.ustin.co/17DAUxl

9:07am May 31st 2013 view on twitter

Re: previous tweet/quote: That is from an article from 1999.. it’s a great read about the natural progression of technology & our resistance

8:39am May 31st 2013 view on twitter